Featured Post

Blaine Case

Official Summary: In outline, proposal by the broker to repurchase 14 million remarkable portions of Blaine Kitchenware with $ 50 million ob...

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

Blaine Case

Official Summary: In outline, proposal by the broker to repurchase 14 million remarkable portions of Blaine Kitchenware with $ 50 million obligation and $209 million money close by would bring about after monetary measurement changes: * Increase the estimation of the firm through the advantage of duty shield from current $960million to $1. 063billion. * The offer outcomes in 3% expansion in EPS from $0. 91 to $0. 93 dependent on 2006 money related numbers. * An expansion of 7. 3% on ROE from 11% to 18. 3% dependent on 2006 money related numbers. * After modification, share costs will be $18. 0. Proposed Buy-Back Plan Analysis:Although Blaine’s current money related circumstance is sound with no obligation, its present monetary record is under turned and over fluid contrast with its companions. The current money related structure wins little profit for the momentary resources while doesn't permit the firm to profit by any obligation premium duty shield. The proposed capital str ucture will profit the organization by turning its asset report. It will give an intrigue charge shield to the pay accordingly expanding the estimation of the firm for the investors. Since enthusiasm on obligation is a duty deductible cost, assuming obligation will viably bring down the available salary permitting the firm to pay less tax.The current enormous money and momentary attractive protections on the monetary record make Blaine an alluring objective for a dominate. The enormous money on monetary record could viably be utilized as an insurance to fund a dominate or merger of Blaine. Such attributes pull in private value firms in which can use the over-fluid circumstance for their potential benefit. The current develop nature of business additionally requires a turned capital structure. A firm in this circumstance ought not follow a hierarchy, as it would hold down the estimation of the firm while making it alluring for a dominate or merger.Less money in asset report additiona lly diminishes office cost by compelling directors to put distinctly in circumstances that are lined up with investors vision and premium in this manner lessening inefficient speculations not profiting investors. Concerning the future acquisitions, Blaine can either utilize obligation or issue stocks when proper. Moreover the proposed share repurchase will give more control to family speculators. Since beginning IPO and past acquisitions has weakened the offers, family control in Blaine has been on decrease and a wellspring of concern.The proposed share repurchase will return more control into family investor hands further setting their help for the new capital structure. The repurchase offer would influence both pay explanation and monetary record of the firm. To be determined sheet obligation is expanded by $50 million, money is diminished by $209 million while value is decreased by $259 million. The rest of the money can be utilized to finance occasional pinnacle activity in blen d with extra transient obligation should it be required. Our EPS will increment by 3% to $0. 93 from current $0. 91 and our ROE will see a huge increment from 11% to 18. % further bringing Blaine closer to its rivals. The consequence of extra obligation in a critical position sheet will expand the estimation of the firm from current $960million to $1. 063billion while balanced offer costs will ascend to $18. The expansion in share esteem is because of increment in the estimation of the firm from $960million to $1. 06billion due to turning up the firm since estimation of any turned firm is its unlevered esteem in addition to its assessment rate duplicated by its enthusiasm bearing obligation. The $18. 50 offer holds a premium over balanced future offer cost of $18 hence making the proposed capital structure appealing to shareholders.The obligation to value proportion of 2. 5% is as yet traditionalist and lined up with the vision of the organization not to over use obligation in its c apital structure. Moreover the expansion in Enterprise Value to EBITDA proportion from 9. 9% to 14. 8% will make the firm progressively exorbitant to be obtained along these lines less appealing for a dominate. A profit strategy instead of the stock repurchase won't give a similar incentive to the organization and its investors. Profits are exposed to higher duty rate contrast with capital addition expanded because of offer purchase back.This debilitates investors from want to get high profits instead of higher capital addition as offer qualities increment. An examination is made underneath between the proposed capital structure and profit strategy. | Share buyback| One-time extraordinary money dividends| Pros| Increase EPS/ROE, pos. indication of future profit, Lower charge rate contrast with div policy| Happy investors, positive indication of future income, | Cons| Limiting liquidity, opportunity cost | Limiting liquidity, opportunity cost, higher expense rate contrast with capita l addition policy| Share outstanding| Decrease| No change|EPS| Increase| No change| ROE| Increase| In rundown we suggest the offer repurchase plan, as it will build the estimation of the firm, shield some portion of pay from charges, increment return on value and brings down organization cost. The expansion in estimation of the firm and lower money close by additionally makes the firm less alluring objective of a dominate. Supporting Material: Case Exhibit 1 Income Statement| | With Repurchase Option| |  | | |Operating Results:| | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 | Revenue| | 291,940 | 307,964 | 342,251 | 342,251 | Less: Cost of Goods Sold| | 204,265 | 220,234 | 249,794 | 249,794 | Gross Profit| | 87,676 | 87,731 | 92,458 | 92,458 | Less: Selling, General and Administrative| 25,293 | 27,049 | 28,512 | 28,512 | Operating Income| | 62,383 | 60,682 | 63,946 | 63,946 | Plus: Depreciation and Amortization| | 6,987 | 8,213 | 9,914 | 9,914 | EBITDA| | 69,370 | 68,895 | 73,860 | 73,860 |  | |  | |EBIT| | 62,383 | 60,682 | 63,946 | 63,946 | Plus: Other Income (expense)| | 15,719 | 16,057 | 13,506 | 0 | No attractive security income| Less Interest| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,375 | Tax shield amount| Earnings Before Tax| | 78,101 | 76,738 | 77,451 | 60,571 | Less: Taxes| | 24,989 | 24,303 | 23,821 | 18,629 | Net Income| | 53,112 | 52,435 | 53,630 | 41,942 | Dividends| | 18,589 | 22,871 | 28,345 | 22,167 | Assume same 53% div policy|  | |  | |  | | Margins:|  | |Revenue Growth| | 3. 2%| 5. 5%| 11. 1%| 0. 0%| | Gross Margin| | 30. 0%| 28. 5%| 27. 0%| 27. 0%| | EBIT Margin| | 21. 4%| 19. 7%| 18. 7%| 18. 7%| | EBITDA Margin| | 23. 8%| 22. 4%| 21. 6%| 21. 6%| | Effective Tax Rate (1)| | 32. 0%| 31. 7%| 30. 8%| 30. 8%| | Net Income Margin| | 18. 2%| 17. 0%| 15. 7%| 12. 3%| | Dividend payout ratio|  | 35. 0%| 43. 6%| 52. 9%| 52. 9%| | Case Exhibit 2 Balance Sheet| | With Repurchase Option|  | | Assets:| | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2006 |Cash and Cash Equivalents| | 67,391 | 70,853 | 66,557 | 21,866 | Marketable Securities| | 218,403 | 196,763 | 164,309 | 0 | Accounts Receivable| | 40,709 | 43,235 | 48,780 | 48,780 | Inventory| | 47,262 | 49,728 | 54,874 | 54,874 | Other Current Assets| | 2,586 | 3,871 | 5,157 | 5,157 | Total Current Assets| | 376,351 | 364,449 | 339,678 | 130,678 |  | |  | Property, Plant and Equipment| | 99,402 | 138,546 | 174,321 | 174,321 | Goodwill| | 8,134 | 20,439 | 38,281 | 38,281 |Other Assets| | 13,331 | 27,394 | 39,973 | 39,973 | Total Assets| | 497,217 | 550,829 | 592,253 | 383,253 |  | |  | Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:| |  | Accounts Payable| | 26,106 | 28,589 | 31,936 | 31,936 | Accrued Liabilities| | 22,605 | 24,921 | 27,761 | 27,761 | Taxes Payable| | 14,225 | 17,196 | 16,884 | 16,884 | Total Current Liabilities| | 62,935 | 70,705 | 76,581 | 76,581 | Other liabilities| | 1,794 | 3,151 | 4,814 | 4,814 | debt| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50,000 |Deferred Taxes| | 15,111 | 18,434 | 22,495 | 22,495 | Total Liabilities | 79,840 | 92,290 | 103,890 | 153,890 | Shareholders' Equity| | 417,377 | 458,538 | 488,363 | 229,363 | Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity| 497,217 | 550,829 | 592,253 | 383,253 |  | EPS |  | Per Outstanding Shares of| Before| $0. 908 | 59,052,083 | After| $0. 931 | 45,052,083 | Improvement| 2. 51%| | ROE|  | @ Book Equity| Before| 10. 98%| $488,363 | After| 18. 9%| $229,363 | Equity Value|  | Vu| $959,596 | VL| $1,063,196 | New Share Prices| $18. 00 | Case Exhibit 3 †Peer Comparison | Home ; Hearth Design| AutoTech Appliances| XQL Corp. | Bunkerhill, Inc. | EasyLiving Systems| | Blaine Kitchenware| Blaine Kitchenware After Repurchase| |  | | Revenue| $589,747| $18,080,000| $4,313,300| $3,671,100| $188,955| | $342,251| 342251. 25| EBIT| 106,763 | 2,505,200 | 721,297 | 566,099 | 19,613 | 63,946 | 63945. 5| EBITDA| 119,190 | 3,055,200 | 796,497 | 610,399 | 23,356 | 73,860 | 73,860 | Net income| $53,698| $1,416,012| $412,307| $335,073| $13,173|  | $53,630| 41941. 55799| | Cash ; securities| $21,495| $536,099| $21,425| $153,680| $242,102| | $230,866| 21,866 | Net working capital*| 54,316 | 1,247,520 | 353,691 | 334,804 | 21,220 | 32,231 | †| Net fixed assets| 900,803 | 7,463,564 | 3,322,837 | 815,304 | 68,788 | 174,321 | 174,321 | Total assets| $976,613| $9,247,183| $3,697,952| $1,303,788| $332,110|  | $592,253| 383,253 | |Net obligation (1)| $350,798 | $4,437,314 | $950,802 | $238,056 | ($64,800)| | ($230,866)| 28,134 | Total debt| 372,293 | 4,973,413 | 972,227 | 391,736 | 177,302 | †| 50,000| Book equity| $475,377 | $3,283,000 | $2,109,400 | $804,400 | $94,919 |  | $488,363 | 229,363 | Market capitalization| 776,427 | 13,978,375 | 5,290,145 | 3,962,780 | 418,749 |  | 959,596 | 1063196. 354| Enterprise esteem (MVIC)| $1,127,226 | $18,415,689 | $6,240,947 | $4,200,836 | $353,949 |  | $728,730 | 1,091,330 | Equity beta| 1. 03| 1. 24| 0.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Slavery in Latin America Essay -- Latin American History Slavery Essay

Bondage in Latin America Chile History Prior to the appearance of the Spanish in the sixteenth penny., the Araucanians had for quite some time been in charge of the land in the southern piece of the district; in the north, the occupants were governed by the Inca domain. Diego de Almagro, who was sent by Francisco Pizarro from Peru to investigate the southern area, drove a gathering of men through the Andes into the focal marshes of Chile however was fruitless (1536) in setting up a decent footing there. In 1540, Pedro de Valdivia walked into Chile and, in spite of bold opposition from the Araucanians, established Santiago (1541) and later settled La Serena, Concepciã ³n, and Valdivia. After an underlying time of unremitting fighting with the locals, the Spanish prevailing with regards to oppressing the indigenous populace. In spite of the fact that Chile was ugly to the Spanish due to its separation from Peru toward the north and its absence of valuable metals (copper was found a lot later), the Spanish built up a peaceful society there dependent on enormous farms and haciendas worked by indigenous individuals; the yields were sent to Peru. During the long frontier time, the mestizos turned into a sharecropper class, called inquilinos; albeit actually free, most were practically speaking bound to the dirt. During a large portion of the provincial time frame Chile was a captaincy general ward upon the viceroyalty of Peru, yet in 1778 it turned into a different division basically free of Peru. Regional cutoff points were not well characterized and were the reason, after freedom, of protracted limit debates with Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. The development toward freedom started in 1810 under the administration of Juan Martã ­nez de Rozas and Bernardo O'Higgins. The principal stage (1810-14) finished tragically at Rancagua, to a great extent in light of the contention of O'Higgins with Josã © Miguel Carrera and his siblings. In 1817, Josã © de San Martã ­n, with unbelievable hardship, brought a military over the Andes from Argentina to Chile. The next year he won the definitive clash of Maipã º over the Spaniards. The New Nation O'Higgins, who had been picked preeminent executive, officially announced Chile's autonomy Feb. 12, 1818, at Talca and set up a military despotism that described the republic's governmental issues until 1833; O'Higgins administered Chile from 1818 until 1823, when solid restriction to his approaches constrained him to leave. During this time the Britis... ... an immature nation met with little achievement, albeit incredible individual fortunes were amassed from tin mining by investors, for example, Simã ³n I. Patiã ±o. Clashing cases to the Chaco, which was believed to be oil-rich, welcomed on one more tragic regional war, this time with Paraguay (1932-35). The battling finished in 1935 with the two countries depleted and Bolivia vanquished and deprived of the greater part of its cases around there. Projects for restoring the ills of the country were hampered by military overthrows and countercoups. World War II demonstrated an aid to the Bolivian economy by expanding requests for tin and wolframite. Global weight over star German components in the administration in the long run constrained Bolivia to break relations with the Axis and announce war (1943). Rising costs exasperated the fretfulness of the excavators over hopeless working conditions; strikes were mercilessly stifled. The emergency arrived at a top in Dec., 1943, when the nationalistic, genius digger National Revolutionary Movement (MNR) built a fruitful revolt. The system, in any case, was not perceived by other American countries (with the exception of Argentina) until 1944, when star Axis components in the MNR were formally expelled.

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Top 10 Communication Tips 2011 #10 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Top 10 Communication Tips 2011 â€" #10 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog This is the tenth and final entry in our “Top 10? list for you to consider when communicating with our office and applying. Number 10 â€" Subscribe to this blog The best way to stay up-to-date regarding matters of admission is to subscribe to this blog.   Yes the SIPA Web site is a great source of information and you should scour it for information, but for the most part the Web site is static and is rarely updated.   We try to update it as needed, but the blog is much more informative as far as the day-to-day things going on in our office. Over in the right menu of the blog there is an empty box with “Subscribe” written below it.   Simply enter your email and each and every time this blog is updated, you will receive an email message letting you know there is new content. Why is it a good idea to subscribe?   Well for one we try to monitor common questions and post answers to the site for mass consumption.   Two, this is your window into the admission cycle.   We will update you on what is going on in our office.   And finally, this is a great way to find out more about what is going on at SIPA and to learn about fellowship opportunities.   You can consider this to be the most frequently updated Web space concerning matters of admission and financial aid.